Compartir
Crs Report for Congress: Legislative Options After Citizens United V. Fec: Constitutional and Legal Issues: March 8, 2010 - R41096 (en Inglés)
Congressional Research Service the Libr
(Autor)
·
Erika K. Lunder
(Autor)
·
Paige Whitaker
(Autor)
·
Bibliogov
· Tapa Blanda
Crs Report for Congress: Legislative Options After Citizens United V. Fec: Constitutional and Legal Issues: March 8, 2010 - R41096 (en Inglés) - Whitaker, Paige ; Lunder, Erika K. ; Congressional Research Service the Libr
$ 25.030
$ 34.760
Ahorras: $ 9.730
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Jueves 25 de Julio y el
Jueves 01 de Agosto.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Crs Report for Congress: Legislative Options After Citizens United V. Fec: Constitutional and Legal Issues: March 8, 2010 - R41096 (en Inglés)"
In Citizens United v. FEC, the Supreme Court invalidated two provisions of the Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA), finding that they were unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The decision struck down the long-standing prohibition on corporations using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures, and Section 203 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (BCRA), prohibiting corporations from using their general treasury funds for "electioneering communications." BCRA defines "electioneering communication" as any broadcast, cable, or satellite communication that refers to a clearly identified federal candidate made within 60 days of a general election or 30 days of a primary. The Court determined that these prohibitions constitute a "ban on speech" in violation of the First Amendment. The Court, however, upheld the disclaimer and disclosure requirements in Sections 201 and 311 of BCRA as applied to a movie regarding a presidential candidate that was produced by Citizens United, a tax-exempt corporation, and the broadcast advertisements it planned to run promoting the movie. As a result of the Court's ruling, federal campaign finance law no longer restricts corporate or, most likely, labor union use of general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for any communication expressly advocating election or defeat ...
