Name: Dialogue on Chinese Culture (en Inglés)
Price: 123540.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Ren, Qi ; Luo, (Ed ). Ligang ; Jian, (Ed ). Aurora
ISBN: 9786206150220

portada Dialogue on Chinese Culture (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Qi Ren

(Ed ). Ligang Luo

(Ed ). Aurora Jian

Editorial

LAP Lambert Academic Publishing

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

416

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

22.9 x 15.2 x 2.4 cm

Peso

0.61 kg.

ISBN13

9786206150220

Categorías

Historia de la humanidad

Dialogue on Chinese Culture (en Inglés)

Qi Ren (Autor) · (Ed ). Ligang Luo (Autor) · (Ed ). Aurora Jian (Autor) · LAP Lambert Academic Publishing · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 123.540

$ 247.070

Ahorras: $ 123.530

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 12 de Julio y el Viernes 19 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Dialogue on Chinese Culture (en Inglés)"

Since May Fourth sages put forward the idea of "down with Confucius", and there has been much debate on the "national character" of the Chinese people, with many of them denouncing and few praising. Those who have denounced often directed their criticisms at the cultural genes of Chinese "nationhood", the traditional culture of conservative, regressive, and even barbaric absolutism. This book attempts to justify the "nationality" of the Chinese people in the manner of Hu Shih's "arranging the national heritage", but using standpoints of Jiu Jin. Specifically, it compares the Greek "ideal state" with the Chinese "commonwealth", the Western rule of law with the Chinese rule of etiquette, the Western democracy with the Chinese people-oriented approach, the Western sentiment with the Chinese reasoning, and the Western progress with the Chinese conservatism. By comparing the five conservative aspects, we try to explain that Eastern and Western cultures have their strengths and weaknesses, and that it's not appropriate to a priori use some kind of "universal" standard to judge and standardise everything uniformly.