Name: Global Health Programs and Partnerships: Evidence of Mutual Benefit and Equity (en Inglés)
Price: 106500.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Muir, Jonathan A. ; Farley, Jessica ; Osterman, Allison
ISBN: 9781442259089

portada Global Health Programs and Partnerships: Evidence of Mutual Benefit and Equity (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Jonathan A. Muir

Jessica Farley

Allison Osterman

Editorial

Center for Strategic & International Studies

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

102

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

27.4 x 21.1 x 0.5 cm

Peso

0.28 kg.

ISBN13

9781442259089

Categorías

Guerra y defensa bélica
Salud pública y medicina preventiva
Cuestiones de medicina legal

Global Health Programs and Partnerships: Evidence of Mutual Benefit and Equity (en Inglés)

Jonathan A. Muir (Autor) · Jessica Farley (Autor) · Allison Osterman (Autor) · Center for Strategic & International Studies · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 106.500

$ 147.910

Ahorras: $ 41.410

28% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 26 de Julio y el Viernes 02 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Global Health Programs and Partnerships: Evidence of Mutual Benefit and Equity (en Inglés)"

Academic global health programs are proliferating, and global health partnerships between North American academic institutions and institutions in low- and middle-income countries are steadily increasing. This study employs surveys and key informant interviews to examine global health partnerships, and it presents a framework for success to guide the development of sustainable global health programs and partnerships with measurable, defined impact. Eighty-two North American academic institutions and 46 international partnering institutions participated in the survey. Key informant interviews were conducted with global health leaders at 15 North American academic institutions and 11 partnering international institutions. Quantitative data were analyzed using linear regression, and qualitative data were used in thematic analyses. The surveys and interviews provide evidence of mutual benefits resulting from these global health partnerships, as well as areas for further development and improvement.