Name: Shadow Realignment, Partisan Strength and Competition: 1960 to 2000 (en Inglés)
Price: 142670.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Albert J. Nelson
ISBN: 9780275973032

portada Shadow Realignment, Partisan Strength and Competition: 1960 to 2000 (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Praeger

Autor

Albert J. Nelson

Año

2001

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

128

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN

0275973034

ISBN13

9780275973032

Categorías

Ciencias políticas

Shadow Realignment, Partisan Strength and Competition: 1960 to 2000 (en Inglés)

Albert J. Nelson (Autor) · Praeger · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 142.670

$ 285.340

Ahorras: $ 142.670

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Jueves 11 de Julio y el Jueves 18 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Shadow Realignment, Partisan Strength and Competition: 1960 to 2000 (en Inglés)"

Challenging the argument that party cycles no longer exist, Nelson reconstructs party strength indices associated with national and state Democratic electoral outcomes between 1960 and 2000. Four periods are distinguishable, Democratic liberalism of 1960-1968, Dealignment between 1968-1984, the shadow realignment during 1985-1992, and the conservative consolidation between 1993-2000. During each of these periods party competition increased and Republicans gained ground, setting the groundwork for the GOP's national and local success in the 2000 elections. The variable effects of the South, proportion of foreign-born population, and population change in each state on contemporary party strength and presidential elections from 1980 to 2000 are also explained. Students and scholars interested in political parties, American government, and state and local government will find Nelson's findings compelling. Displaying an overwhelming grasp of the literature on partisan change, Nelson presents new and interesting insights that help to explain why traditional alignment theory cannot explain the partisan change that has taken place over the past forty years.