Name: The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief (en Inglés)
Price: 97860.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Dale A. Nance
ISBN: 9781107124189

portada The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Editorial

Cambridge University Press

Autor

Dale A. Nance

Año

2016

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

346

Encuadernación

Tapa Dura

ISBN13

9781107124189

Categorías

Derecho procesal penal

The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief (en Inglés)

Dale A. Nance (Autor) · Cambridge University Press · Tapa Dura

Libro Nuevo

$ 97.860

$ 195.710

Ahorras: $ 97.850

50% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Miércoles 10 de Julio y el Miércoles 17 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "The Burdens of Proof: Discriminatory Power, Weight of Evidence, and Tenacity of Belief (en Inglés)"

Adjudicative tribunals in both criminal and non-criminal cases rely on the concept of the 'burden of proof' to resolve uncertainty about facts. Perhaps surprisingly, this concept remains clouded and deeply controversial. Written by an internationally renowned scholar, this book explores contemporary thinking on the evidential requirements that are critical for all practical decision-making, including adjudication. Although the idea that evidence must favor one side over the other to a specified degree, such as 'beyond reasonable doubt', is familiar, less well-understood is an idea associated with the work of John Maynard Keynes, namely that there are requirements on the total amount of evidence considered to decide the case. The author expertly explores this distinct Keynesian concept and its implications. Hypothetical examples and litigated cases are included to assist understanding of the ideas developed. Implications include an expanded conception of the burden of producing evidence and how it should be administered.