Compartir
The Well Pled Civil Racketeering Complaint In Federal Court, An Attorneys Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 Shield Or Sword: A Litigation Survival Tool (en Inglés)
Jd Joe Pappacoda
(Autor)
·
Ghostwriter Paralegal Chartered
(Autor)
·
Independently Published
· Tapa Blanda
The Well Pled Civil Racketeering Complaint In Federal Court, An Attorneys Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 Shield Or Sword: A Litigation Survival Tool (en Inglés) - Pappacoda, Jd Joe ; Chartered, Ghostwriter Paralegal
$ 41.520
$ 57.670
Ahorras: $ 16.150
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Lunes 15 de Julio y el
Lunes 22 de Julio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "The Well Pled Civil Racketeering Complaint In Federal Court, An Attorneys Rule 12(b)(6) and Rule 56 Shield Or Sword: A Litigation Survival Tool (en Inglés)"
GhostWriter Paralegal, Chartered is a legal research and complex technical litigation law office support organization located in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. It is not a law firm. The topics included in this publication were critically analyzed for Attorneys who considered their veracity. For further information contact: www.GhostWriterParalegal.com. Joe Pappacoda is a former senior trial attorney, former prosecutor, and former special agent.The information provided in this publication is a recitation of excerpted information published in the federal cases cited; reformatted in logical sequence mirroring the legal technical requirements of a well pled federal RICO Complaint, as summarized in the table of contents. The second part of the book is a case study analysis, applying the principles learned from part 1 to specific factual averments made in an actual 2017 federal RICO Complaint filed by Geico against numerous health care providers, law firms, physicians, and attorneys, to examine whether technical RICO pleading requirements were met, and to foster critical thinking regarding other potential issues that could have been raised by defendants, that if raised, may have altered the outcome of that case.
