Name: U.S. Conventional Forces and Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study (en Inglés)
Price: 26570.00 CLP
Availability: InStock
Author: Bolkcom, Christopher
ISBN: 9781288670796

portada U.S. Conventional Forces and Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

Christopher Bolkcom

Editorial

Bibliogov

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm

Peso

0.08 kg.

ISBN13

9781288670796

Categorías

Política y gobierno

U.S. Conventional Forces and Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study (en Inglés)

Christopher Bolkcom (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 26.570

$ 44.280

Ahorras: $ 17.710

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Viernes 09 de Agosto y el Viernes 16 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de Chile entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "U.S. Conventional Forces and Nuclear Deterrence: A China Case Study (en Inglés)"

Congress and the Department of Defense (DOD) are engaged in an extended discourse over the future direction of U.S. defense strategy and military force structure. In the past, these discussions have focused almost exclusively on questions related to U.S. conventional military forces, with discussions about nuclear weapons held in separate fora. However, the 2005 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR) examined both nuclear and conventional forces, a first in the QDR's history. This indicates that analysts both inside and outside government are beginning to review and assess the potential deterrent and operational relationship between conventional and nuclear weapons. It appears that considerable pressure is building on DOD leaders to make strategy and force structure decisions with cost-effectiveness in mind. A key question for contemporary defense planners is what proportion of U.S. military capabilities should be focused on traditional military challenges and what proportion should be focused on non-traditional challenges, such as "irregular, disruptive and catastrophic" threats?